The metaverse and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly intersecting in educational contexts, yet limited empirical research has examined how generative AI avatars function within socially interactive virtual environments. This study investigates the deployment of generative AI avatars within a socio-educational metaverse environment. Using a developmental evaluation approach, data were collected through interviews with seven institutional stakeholders, teacher-generated reflections, internal documentation, embedded user feedback captured through in-platform reporting tools, and longitudinal field memos across an iterative deployment cycle. Findings indicate that the transition from scripted NPCs to generative AI avatars recalibrated users’ attribution of agency, intensified dialogic unpredictability, and elevated social realism beyond visual fidelity. Voice-mediated interaction emerged as a threshold mechanism for co-presence, while algorithmic improvisation exposed tensions between pedagogical intent and stochastic response generation. The deployment further revealed affective frictions, expectation misalignments, and the mediating role of AI literacy in shaping trust, participation, and interpretive coherence. Overall, the study advances a sociotechnical understanding of AI avatars as co-constructors of meaning and interaction, offering implications for the design, implementation, and governance of future AI-enhanced metaverse learning environments.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped various aspects of human lives, particularly through its capabilities to address complex sustainability challenges. Despite the rapid expansion of AI applications, their contribution to cleaner production and sustainable development remains underexplored, especially in developing nations. In Southeast Asia (SEA), where AI adoption has grown substantially across environmental, economic, and social dimensions, research that examines its role in cleaner production outcomes remains fragmented. In view of this gap, this study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) of AI applications related to cleaner production and sustainable development by examining relevant themes, application areas, and sustainability dimensions addressed by AI, while evaluating the maturity of AI methodologies, alignment with cleaner production outcomes, and integration with circular economy and resource efficiency goals. Moreover, it investigates the barriers and challenges that constrain AI application and offers future research directions to advance AI deployment for cleaner production and sustainable development across SEA countries.

As calls to center lived experience in higher education intensify, so too do concerns about the ethical, emotional, and structural risks involved in integrating real-life narratives into pedagogy. This study introduces Simulated Lived Experience (SLE) as a novel pedagogical modality that leverages the immersive affordances of learning environments like the metaverse to approximate systemic conditions of marginalization without reproducing trauma or requiring emotional labor from marginalized individuals. Drawing on critical pedagogy frameworks and affect theory, the research explores how SLE enables learners to engage with ethical discomfort, narrative complexity, and affective dissonance through the enactment of virtual selves. A qualitative design was employed, with data collected via semi-structured interviews from 12 participants who engaged in metaverse-based simulations portraying exclusionary dynamics related to disability, race, and institutional access. Thematic analysis generated four key findings: (1) virtual simulations evoke affective authenticity but also ethical unease, (2) embodied disorientation fosters structural insight, (3) narrative authorship and representation are ethically contested, and (4) discomfort acts as a catalyst for critical reflection. The study concludes that while SLE cannot replace lived experience, it can function as a powerful epistemic mediator when designed collaboratively, approached reflexively, and grounded in epistemic care.

Effective teaching forms the bedrock of education, directly influencing program accreditation and institutional performance. A competitive and supportive learning environment, fostered by strong faculty performance, is crucial for an academic institution to achieve its vision and mission. This study incorporates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) principles, ensuring that faculty performance evaluation contributes to long-term educational sustainability. Addressing the pressing need for robust faculty performance assessment, data mining algorithms are employed to extract insightful information regarding effective instruction, utilizing both structured and unstructured data. The developed system aims to empower institutions to identify their strengths, address areas for improvement, and cultivate continuous growth in teaching and learning processes by discerning trends within faculty data. Furthermore, sentiment analysis methods are utilized to evaluate qualitative input, with Laravel 8.0 serving as the framework for algorithm implementation. Expert evaluations of the system yielded a grand mean score of 4.38, deemed 'Very Acceptable,' thereby affirming its reliability and efficacy in supporting faculty performance reviews and advancing SDG objectives.